UK

Zopa Removes Listings – Concentrates on Markets

wiseclerk 2 Comments

Recently Zopa UK removed the ‘Listings’ functionality that allowed borrowers to list individual loans. Listings were introduced in October 2007 as a add-on to the original Zopa markets model.

Here is the official announcement of Zopa regarding the removal of the Listings function:

You might know that Zopa is a little unusual amongst the now 30+ peer-to-peer lending companies running worldwide in that we facilitate the vast majority of loans through the Zopa Markets; almost all the other peer-to-peer lenders make all their loans using something more like our Listings. Indeed, we weren’t first-to-market with the Listings approach, adding them to our site about two and a half years after we first launched. Since then some 700 Zopa borrowers have received loans totaling £4.3m using Zopa Listings and there’s been some great ones in there; from guitar re-stringing, to a planetarium, a few bits of plastic surgery and of course plenty of cars.

Sadly though, while those figures sound quite good, they only represent a very small proportion of total Zopa lending and that proportion is declining too, while the rest of our business is growing rapidly. Couple that with Listings being much more long-winded to underwrite and we hope you’ll understand why we’ve taken the tough decision to draw Zopa Listings to a close.

… we’ll remove the functionality from the site that allows borrowers to create a new Listing. All the Listings that are already live before this point will of course be allowed to continue to their natural conclusion and once they’re all finalized, we’ll remove all references to Listings from the site.

If you’ve taken part in any lending via Listings, you’ll still be able to keep track of them and monitor how they’re being repaid in My Loan Book, where you can now find a link to your borrower’s original Listing page in the detail page of the loan in My Loan Book (click on the borrower’s username to open this view).

We hope you understand our decision.

Best wishes,

The Zopa Team

Fundingcircle Raises £2.5 Million Funding From Index Ventures

wiseclerk 1 Comment

British Fundingcircle.com has announced the closing of £2.5m of Series A financing from Index Ventures, co-investors and existing shareholders.

Since Funding Circle launched in August 2010, more than 4,000 businesses and savers have signed up, with 11.5 million GBP offered to businesses to date. Currently, lenders have collectively earned 120,000 GBP in interest with average yields of 8.3% with access to their funds through Funding Circle’s secondary market. fee from lenders and 2% fee from borrowers. Yield is calculated before fees, tax deductions and bad debt. To date, no businesses have defaulted on loans and therefore no bad debt has been incurred by any lender.

Samir Desai, co-founder of Funding Circle, said: “We are delighted to welcome such a prominent and well respected investor as Index Ventures as a shareholder in Funding Circle.”

CARE Runs Lendwithcare Microfinance Platform

wiseclerk

CARE International UK runs the p2p microfinance platform Lendwithcare.org. For a minimum investment of 15 GBP anybody can help funding a loan to entrepreneurs in Africa or Asia.

Lendwithcare has partnered with local MFIs in Benin, Togo, Philippines, Cambodia and Indonesia that disburse the loan to the borrower. Lenders do not receive interest. Aside from the default risk (Lendwithcare claims less than 2% bad debt) lenders also bear the currency exchange rate risk. Lenders do fill their account via Paypal or credit card, withdrawels are through Paypal.

Though the concept closely resembles Kiva’s, it is interesting to see the approach used by a long-time established aid and development organisation. The site shows the experience CARE has with marketing and fundraising. It looks much more flashy (at least compared to the old Kiva page).

Lendwithcare was launched in April 2010. Since then 243 loans were funded. At the moment there are about 32 loan request by entrepreneurs listed.

State of Selected P2P Lending Companies

wiseclerk

More than 2 years have passed, since P2P-Banking.com published the first overview table of p2p lending companies. At that time the focus was to create a comprehensive list and to get a perspective on the loan volumes.

Today I want to look at a smaller selection of p2p lending companies and do a rating on more factors than just loan volume. While I describe below what factors led to my rating, please note that the rating represents my personal opinion.

The table lists the companies in alphabetical order and gives:

New loan volume per month

This amount is in most cases retrieved from the last month(s) figures from the company websites (if they have statistic sections), and then converted into US$ at today’s currency exchange rates. In other cases it is a rough estimate by me based on volume figures published in media in the recent past. For CommunityLend I failed to find a per month figure (the total figure from launch to mid-February is here).

Brand/Press

Extend and tone of press coverage in the past months. Since a large share of new users is introduced to p2p lending services via media, positive media coverage is extremely important. Continued positive media coverage has helped some companies to associate positive values to their brand.

Growth/Marketing

This column especially rates if the new loan volume is growing continuously month after month. Furthermore it puts the absolute volume into perspective to the size of the market. It is obvious that absolute numbers in a country with a small population (e.g. Canada) will be much lower than those in a country with a large population (e.g. US). Furthermore it takes into account if the (online) marketing measures of the the company succeed in winning new borrowers and lenders (though in most markets lenders do not need to be actively acquired).

Sustainability

Sustainability rates a mix of several factors:

  1. ROIs for lenders / default rates
    Most p2p lending companies that failed in the past, did so as a result of high default rates which led to negative lender ROIs and caused massive lender churn
  2. Ability of company to raise new funding
    Most p2p lending companies still have to bridge a considerable time-span at their current growth rate before they become cash flow positive. The ability to raise more funding to finance continued operation is essential for their success
  3. Business model

User satisfaction

This rates the publicly voiced user opinion. Major factor are the comments in forums. To a lesser degree I took the user experience published in blog articles into account. The problem with lender experiences published in blogs often is that the writer is casting a positive image, since he earns commissions for newly referred customers through the affiliate program of the p2p lending site. Also these review are often written at the start of the lending activity at which point the lender’s ROI is naturally unharmed by the experience of defaults.


Empty fields: I had not enough information to rate these. E.g. with some of the new UK p2p lending companies I felt I had too few indicators to reach an opinion on the sustainability.

Availability of information also influenced the selection of companies. Due to language barriers including more services (e.g. the Japanese p2p lending companies) was not feasible for me.

Peer-to-Peer Equity: Crowdcube

wiseclerk 2 Comments

With the introduction of p2p lending some lenders wrote that the concept enabled everyone to feel as banker.

Now, newly launched Crowdcube.com enables any UK resident to feel as venture capitalist for a financial commitment as low as 10 GBP. Investors can browse pitches which usually include business plans and financial projections and sometimes even video pitches.

In return for the investment, investors get shares of the company. For example entrepreneur Daniel Vinson wants to raise 50,000 GBP. He is offering 49% equity in return, meaning investors roughly get 1% shares in return for 1,000 GBP investment. So far 11 investors have pledged 1,200 GBP.

There are 6 entrepreneurs pitching for funding at the moment. Interested investors can answer questions and for some businesses a lively discussion has started.

Crowdcube, founded by Darren Westlake and Luke Lang, launched 2 weeks ago. Crowdcube’s business model is to offer a platform to match entrepreneurs with peer investors and business angels. Costs for entrepreneurs are a success fee of 5% of the funding amount plus legal fees of 1750 GBP for completion of each company investment.  For a limited period they are waiving the 250 GBP listing fee to register as an entrepreneur and add a pitch.

Investors are charged a processing fee by Crowdcube for each transaction equal to the sum of 0.20 GBP plus 4% of the value of the transaction. Continue reading →